Murray v. Rosenheim
212 A.D. 858
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1925
StatusPublished
This text of 212 A.D. 858 (Murray v. Rosenheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murray v. Rosenheim, 212 A.D. 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
Opinions
.Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Burr, JJ., Clarke, P. J., and Dowling, J., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Shifman v. . Whalen
137 N.E. 331 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
212 A.D. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-rosenheim-nyappdiv-1925.