Murray v. Rosenheim

212 A.D. 858

Opinions

.Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, McAvoy and Burr, JJ., Clarke, P. J., and Dowling, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Rosenheim, 212 A.D. 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

212 A.D. 858 (Murray v. Rosenheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shifman v. . Whalen
137 N.E. 331 (New York Court of Appeals, 1922)