Murray v. Pollard

576 F. App'x 209
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2014·No. No. 14-6201·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Adrian D. Murray appeals the district court’s order dismissing after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and its order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P.- 59(e) motion for reconsideration and motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Murray v. Pollard, No. 1:13-cv-00314-FDW, 2014 WL 49963 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 2014; Jan. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Pollard, 576 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2014).

576 F. App'x 209 (Murray v. Pollard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Spencer Peters
843 F.3d 572 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)