Murray v. Pollard
This text of 576 F. App'x 209 (Murray v. Pollard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Adrian D. Murray appeals the district court’s order dismissing after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and its order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P.- 59(e) motion for reconsideration and motion to amend the complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Murray v. Pollard, No. 1:13-cv-00314-FDW, 2014 WL 49963 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 2014; Jan. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
576 F. App'x 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-pollard-ca4-2014.