Murray v. Plyler

217 N.C. 494
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided May 1, 1940·Published

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

As no final judgment has been recovered against the operator of the taxicab which injured the plaintiff, the obligation of the Pennsylvania Casualty Company “to pay any final judgment recovered against the defendant, ~W. S. Croft,” etc., as alleged in the complaint, has not yet arisen. Hence, the ruling on the demurrer will be reversed on authority of Petty v. Lemons, ante, 492, with observation similar to the one there made that the plaintiff may apply to the court below under C. S., 515, for leave to amend her complaint, if so advised.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Plyler, 217 N.C. 494 (N.C. 1940).

217 N.C. 494 (Murray v. Plyler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.