Murray v. Plastridge, Inc.
This text of 338 So. 2d 260 (Murray v. Plastridge, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon review of the briefs and appellate record we are of the opinion that the appellant having been the prevailing party and the party recovering judgment was entitled to the taxing of costs in his favor. Jordan v. Reynolds, 154 So.2d 200 (Fla.3d DCA 1963); Blynn v. Hirsch, 136 So.2d 666 (Fla.3d DCA 1962); F.S. § 57.041. Accordingly, the order denying plaintiff’s motion to tax costs is vacated and set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
338 So. 2d 260, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-plastridge-inc-fladistctapp-1976.