Murray v. Plastridge, Inc.

338 So. 2d 260, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15626
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 15, 1976
DocketNo. 76-524
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 338 So. 2d 260 (Murray v. Plastridge, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Plastridge, Inc., 338 So. 2d 260, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15626 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the briefs and appellate record we are of the opinion that the appellant having been the prevailing party and the party recovering judgment was entitled to the taxing of costs in his favor. Jordan v. Reynolds, 154 So.2d 200 (Fla.3d DCA 1963); Blynn v. Hirsch, 136 So.2d 666 (Fla.3d DCA 1962); F.S. § 57.041. Accordingly, the order denying plaintiff’s motion to tax costs is vacated and set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

MAGER, C. J., and CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kendall East Estates, Inc. v. Banks
386 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 So. 2d 260, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-plastridge-inc-fladistctapp-1976.