Murray v. Paisley

1 Yeates 197
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

The evidence is certainly admissible. The defendant is at liberty under his plea, to shew either a general or special property in himself, either by bill of sale., delivery from the plaintiff, contract or otherwise, and the rule of court respecting notice cannot be applied to such a case. The defendant is not bound to give information to his adversary under what pretensions he claims the articles in question; neither is the plaintiff under such necessity. The submission and award are evidence to prove the defendant’s claim, but not incontrovertible. The plaintiff is also at liberty to shew misbehaviour or partiality in the arbitrators, and bring forward every legal exception to the submission and award.

Verdict for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Paisley, 1 Yeates 197 (Pa. 1792).

1 Yeates 197 (Murray v. Paisley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halstead v. Cooper
12 R.I. 500 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1880)
Weaver v. Lawrence
1 U.S. 156 (Supreme Court, 1785)