Murray v. Paisley

1 Yeates 197
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 1792
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Yeates 197 (Murray v. Paisley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Paisley, 1 Yeates 197 (Pa. 1792).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The evidence is certainly admissible. The defendant is at liberty under his plea, to shew either a general or special property in himself, either by bill of sale., delivery from the plaintiff, contract or otherwise, and the rule of court respecting notice cannot be applied to such a case. The defendant is not bound to give information to his adversary under what pretensions he claims the articles in question; neither is the plaintiff under such necessity. The submission and award are evidence to prove the defendant’s claim, but not incontrovertible. The plaintiff is also at liberty to shew misbehaviour or partiality in the arbitrators, and bring forward every legal exception to the submission and award.

Verdict for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halstead v. Cooper
12 R.I. 500 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1880)
Weaver v. Lawrence
1 U.S. 156 (Supreme Court, 1785)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Yeates 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-paisley-pa-1792.