Murray v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

167 A.D.2d 520, 562 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14275

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D.2d 520 (Murray v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 167 A.D.2d 520, 562 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14275 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by [521]*521her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 29, 1989, as granted the separate motions of the defendants City of New York and Republic Elevator Company, Inc., for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the motion of the defendant Republic Elevator Company, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and substituting therefor a provision denying that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff, an employee of the New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, was injured in an elevator accident which occurred in Kings County Hospital, a building that the City of New York leased to the New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation. Since it cannot be said that the hospital building was leased for a "public purpose”, and the City of New York did not make a covenant to repair or reserve a right of reentry, there is no basis to impose liability against the City of New York, as a landlord lessor out of possession (see, Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559). Thus, the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendant City of New York was properly dismissed.

However, the motion of Republic Elevator Company, Inc., for summary judgment is premature since it has failed to provide the plaintiff with relevant facts exclusively within its knowledge and control. Thus, the court erred when it granted that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Terranova v Emil, 20 NY2d 493). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by [521]*521her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated June 29, 1989, as granted the separate motions of the defendants City of New York and Republic Elevator Company, Inc., for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is modified, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the motion of the defendant Republic Elevator Company, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and substituting therefor a provision denying that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff, an employee of the New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, was injured in an elevator accident which occurred in Kings County Hospital, a building that the City of New York leased to the New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation. Since it cannot be said that the hospital building was leased for a "public purpose”, and the City of New York did not make a covenant to repair or reserve a right of reentry, there is no basis to impose liability against the City of New York, as a landlord lessor out of possession (see, Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559). Thus, the complaint insofar as it is asserted against the defendant City of New York was properly dismissed.

However, the motion of Republic Elevator Company, Inc., for summary judgment is premature since it has failed to provide the plaintiff with relevant facts exclusively within its knowledge and control. Thus, the court erred when it granted that defendant’s motion for summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212 [f]; Terranova v Emil, 20 NY2d 493). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D.2d 520, 562 N.Y.S.2d 194, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-new-york-city-health-hospitals-corp-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack