Murray v. Neal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. Neal

256 A.D. 888, 9 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5245

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 5, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D. 888 (Murray v. Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. Neal, 256 A.D. 888, 9 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find no errors of law or fact in this case. Claims such as plaintiff’s are always subject to the closest scrutiny, but, from the whole record, we gain the impression that the plaintiff made out a meritorious case and that the award was reasonable in amount. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff on a claim against an estate for care furnished decedent.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find no errors of law or fact in this case. Claims such as plaintiff’s are always subject to the closest scrutiny, but, from the whole record, we gain the impression that the plaintiff made out a meritorious case and that the award was reasonable in amount. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff on a claim against an estate for care furnished decedent.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 888, 9 N.Y.S.2d 101, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-neal-nyappdiv-1939.