Murray v. National Surety Company

New York Court of Appeals

Murray v. National Surety Company

171 N.E. 776, 253 N.Y. 547, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 912

DecidedMarch 18, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 171 N.E. 776 (Murray v. National Surety Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. National Surety Company, 171 N.E. 776, 253 N.Y. 547, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 912 (N.Y. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the preponderance of evidence sustains the finding of the trial judge that the written contract fails to express the agreement of the parties and should be reformed as the consequence of mutual mistake; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the preponderance of evidence sustains the finding of the trial judge that the written contract fails to express the agreement of the parties and should be reformed as the consequence of mutual mistake; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 N.E. 776, 253 N.Y. 547, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-national-surety-company-ny-1930.