Murray v. Murray

Missouri Court of Appeals

Murray v. Murray

151 S.W.3d 890, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1941, 2004 WL 2933503

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murray v. Murray. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 2004·No. No. WD 62788·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carol Murray appeals the property division in the judgment dissolving her marriage to Harlan Murray. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment. Because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Respondent’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal is denied.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carol Murray appeals the property division in the judgment dissolving her marriage to Harlan Murray. Upon review of the record, we find no error and affirm the trial court’s judgment. Because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.

Respondent’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal is denied.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Murray v. Murray, 151 S.W.3d 890, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1941, 2004 WL 2933503 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

151 S.W.3d 890 (Murray v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.