Murray v. Murray

58 S.E.2d 420, 206 Ga. 702, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 556
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 14, 1950
Docket17019
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 58 S.E.2d 420 (Murray v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Murray, 58 S.E.2d 420, 206 Ga. 702, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 556 (Ga. 1950).

Opinion

*704 Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Though the judgment in the original divorce case had been set aside as being null and void by reason of having been prematurely granted (see Murray v. Dukes, 204 Ga. 865, 52 S. E. 2d, 468), yet the case was still pending when the hearing on the ancillary petition for temporary support of the child was held, although it was more than three years after the filing of the suit for divorce. Accordingly, with the divorce suit pending, the retroactive portion of the judgment, wherein the child was awarded $450, payable $10 per month, to cover the period from the time the divorce suit was filed until the hearing on the rule nisi, was a proper element of temporary support. Swearingen v. Swearingen, 19 Ga. 265 (4); Wright v. Wright, 117 Ga. 867; Killingsworth v. Killingsworth, 148 Ga. 590 (2) (97 S. E. 539); Conley v. Conley, 152 Ga. 184 (5) (108 S. E. 777); Hobbs v. Hobbs, 158 Ga. 571 (4) (123 S. E. 891).

The award of $30 per month for temporary support of the child, and the additional award of $100 attorney’s fees, payable $10 per month, were proper items for consideration in the determination of temporary support for a minor child, under Code §§ 30-202 and 30-206.

While the three items in the aggregate require the payment of $50 per month, and the evidence showed that the earnings of the defendant were $55 per week, this was a question in the discretion of the trial judge; and this court cannot say, as a matter of law, that the trial judge abused his discretion. Hightower v. Hightower, 202 Ga. 643 (44 S. E. 2d, 116).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jamie Daniel v. Travis Daniel
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021
Barnett v. Barnett
204 S.E.2d 168 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Finch v. Finch
97 S.E.2d 576 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 S.E.2d 420, 206 Ga. 702, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-murray-ga-1950.