Murray v. Murray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murray v. Murray

106 So. 2d 859

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murray v. Murray. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 So. 2d 425 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 1958·No. No. 723·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motions to dismiss and to strike, testing the sufficiency of the amended complaint charging extreme cruelty and adultery as grounds for divorce, were denied by the •chancellor. The appeal is from that order. Neither the amended complaint nor the parts of it under attack are made a part of the appeal record. Hence, this court is not in a position to determine whether the pleading under attack is vulnerable.

The order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motions to dismiss and to strike, testing the sufficiency of the amended complaint charging extreme cruelty and adultery as grounds for divorce, were denied by the •chancellor. The appeal is from that order. Neither the amended complaint nor the parts of it under attack are made a part of the appeal record. Hence, this court is not in a position to determine whether the pleading under attack is vulnerable.

The order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

KANNER, C. J., and ALLEN and SHANNON, JJ„ concur.

Murray v. Murray, 106 So. 2d 859 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

106 So. 2d 859 (Murray v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.