Murray v. McNamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. McNamara

277 A.D.2d 1024

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 14, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1024 (Murray v. McNamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. McNamara, 277 A.D.2d 1024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

We find that the action of the municipal civil service commission, insofar as it created a promotion list for the position' of “ rammer ”, was neither illegal nor arbitrary. Order, so far as appealed from by the respondents, reversed and the petition dismissed and, so far as appealed from by the petitioners, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Van Voorhis, J., dissents in part and votes to affirm in all respects. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We find that the action of the municipal civil service commission, insofar as it created a promotion list for the position' of “ rammer ”, was neither illegal nor arbitrary. Order, so far as appealed from by the respondents, reversed and the petition dismissed and, so far as appealed from by the petitioners, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Van Voorhis, J., dissents in part and votes to affirm in all respects. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-mcnamara-nyappdiv-1950.