Murray v. McCarty
This text of 2 Wilson 93 (Murray v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 107. Account. Appellee sued appellants upon a claim for work done in putting up some lattice work, and making several tables and platforms. He verified his claim by affidavit in accordance with article 2266 of the Revised Statutes, and recovered judgment upon it without adducing further evidence than the claim itself. Held, the claim sued upon is not an account within the meaning of article 2266, and the verification of it by affidavit did not dispense with proof of it. [McCamant v. Batsell, 59 Tex. 363; R. R. Co. v. Smith, ante, p. 44.] The judgment is without' competent evidence to support it.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Wilson 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-mccarty-texapp-1884.