Murray v. McCarty

2 Wilson 93
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 9, 1884
DocketNo. 1602
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Wilson 93 (Murray v. McCarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. McCarty, 2 Wilson 93 (Tex. Ct. App. 1884).

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 107. Account. Appellee sued appellants upon a claim for work done in putting up some lattice work, and making several tables and platforms. He verified his claim by affidavit in accordance with article 2266 of the Revised Statutes, and recovered judgment upon it without adducing further evidence than the claim itself. Held, the claim sued upon is not an account within the meaning of article 2266, and the verification of it by affidavit did not dispense with proof of it. [McCamant v. Batsell, 59 Tex. 363; R. R. Co. v. Smith, ante, p. 44.] The judgment is without' competent evidence to support it.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCamant v. Batsell
59 Tex. 363 (Texas Supreme Court, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wilson 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-mccarty-texapp-1884.