Murray v. Mayor of Americus

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Murray v. Mayor of Americus

66 S.E. 629, 7 Ga. App. 212, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 597

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 24, 1909

Docket1822

StatusPublished

This text of 66 S.E. 629 (Murray v. Mayor of Americus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. Mayor of Americus, 66 S.E. 629, 7 Ga. App. 212, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 597 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the petition is without merit, and the court properly overruled it.

2. It is doubtful if the motion to recommit the auditor’s report was timely filed, but even if it was, there was no error in refusing to recommit the report and entering up final judgment in accordance therewith, as the findings of the report were sufficiently full, specific, and definite to enable the court to do so. Judgment affirmed.

Shipp & Sheppard, Dylces & Nisbet, for plaintiffs in error. Maynard & Hooper, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the petition is without merit, and the court properly overruled it.

2. It is doubtful if the motion to recommit the auditor’s report was timely filed, but even if it was, there was no error in refusing to recommit the report and entering up final judgment in accordance therewith, as the findings of the report were sufficiently full, specific, and definite to enable the court to do so. Judgment affirmed.

Shipp & Sheppard, Dylces & Nisbet, for plaintiffs in error. Maynard & Hooper, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 S.E. 629, 7 Ga. App. 212, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-mayor-of-americus-gactapp-1909.