Murray v. Mayor of Americus

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Murray v. Mayor of Americus

66 S.E. 629, 7 Ga. App. 212, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 597

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 24, 1909·No. 1822·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the petition is without merit, and the court properly overruled it.

2. It is doubtful if the motion to recommit the auditor’s report was timely filed, but even if it was, there was no error in refusing to recommit the report and entering up final judgment in accordance therewith, as the findings of the report were sufficiently full, specific, and definite to enable the court to do so. Judgment affirmed.

Shipp & Sheppard, Dylces & Nisbet, for plaintiffs in error. Maynard & Hooper, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, C. J.

1. The demurrer to the petition is without merit, and the court properly overruled it.

2. It is doubtful if the motion to recommit the auditor’s report was timely filed, but even if it was, there was no error in refusing to recommit the report and entering up final judgment in accordance therewith, as the findings of the report were sufficiently full, specific, and definite to enable the court to do so. Judgment affirmed.

Shipp & Sheppard, Dylces & Nisbet, for plaintiffs in error. Maynard & Hooper, contra.

Murray v. Mayor of Americus, 66 S.E. 629, 7 Ga. App. 212, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 597 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

66 S.E. 629 (Murray v. Mayor of Americus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.