Murray v. Lynch
This text of 656 F. App'x 19 (Murray v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Chris Murray appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to dismiss in his action seeking mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Murray v. Lynch, No. 8:14-cv-03865-TDC, 2016 WL 1071004 (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
656 F. App'x 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-lynch-ca4-2016.