Murray v. International Terminal Operating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. International Terminal Operating Co.

91 A.D.2d 532, 458 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 91 A.D.2d 532 (Murray v. International Terminal Operating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. International Terminal Operating Co., 91 A.D.2d 532, 458 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nadel, J.), entered on March 16, 1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the sole issue of damages awarded to plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $400,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nadel, J.), entered on March 16, 1982, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered on the sole issue of damages awarded to plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $400,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sandler, Sullivan and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 532, 458 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-international-terminal-operating-co-nyappdiv-1982.