Murray v. Grider

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Murray v. Grider

302 S.W.2d 859, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 230

DecidedMay 31, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 302 S.W.2d 859 (Murray v. Grider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. Grider, 302 S.W.2d 859, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 230 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal by J. D. Murray from a judgment of the Russell Circuit Court, Hon. T. A. Wilson, Judge, dismissing his complaint against appellee, Herbert Grider, for $1,700 damages growing out of an accident on the highway between appellant’s taxicab and appellee’s farm tractor and trailer, which the complaint alleged was caused by appellee’s negligence. The answer denied negligence upon the part of appellee and by way of counterclaim he sought to recover $100 damages to his truck, which he averred was caused by appellant’s negligence.

A trial resulted in the jury finding both parties negligent and denying recovery to either. The judgment dismissed both the complaint and the counterclaim.

From reading the record and briefs, and examining the authorities cited in the briefs, we find no error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights. Therefore, the motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal by J. D. Murray from a judgment of the Russell Circuit Court, Hon. T. A. Wilson, Judge, dismissing his complaint against appellee, Herbert Grider, for $1,700 damages growing out of an accident on the highway between appellant’s taxicab and appellee’s farm tractor and trailer, which the complaint alleged was caused by appellee’s negligence. The answer denied negligence upon the part of appellee and by way of counterclaim he sought to recover $100 damages to his truck, which he averred was caused by appellant’s negligence.

A trial resulted in the jury finding both parties negligent and denying recovery to either. The judgment dismissed both the complaint and the counterclaim.

From reading the record and briefs, and examining the authorities cited in the briefs, we find no error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights. Therefore, the motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 S.W.2d 859, 1957 Ky. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-grider-kyctapp-1957.