Murray v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

249 A.D. 826, 293 N.Y.S. 415

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 8, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 826 (Murray v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 249 A.D. 826, 293 N.Y.S. 415 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by plaintiff, a customer of defendant, a storekeeper, to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall on the floor of the store, alleged to have been caused by its slippery and dangerous condition owing to spinach leaves thereon, judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Johnston and Taylor, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and the dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by plaintiff, a customer of defendant, a storekeeper, to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall on the floor of the store, alleged to have been caused by its slippery and dangerous condition owing to spinach leaves thereon, judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Johnston and Taylor, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and the dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to prove facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 826, 293 N.Y.S. 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1937.