Murray v. Gibbons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. Gibbons

230 A.D. 775

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 230 A.D. 775 (Murray v. Gibbons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. Gibbons, 230 A.D. 775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff’s guardian ad litem shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $2,000 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Permission is hereby granted to the guardian ad litem to make such stipulation. All concur, except Edgeomb, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts on the grounds, first, that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence as to the negligence of the defendant, and second, that the conduct of counsel were such as to render a fair and impartial trial on the merits impossible. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff’s guardian ad litem shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $2,000 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Permission is hereby granted to the guardian ad litem to make such stipulation. All concur, except Edgeomb, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the facts on the grounds, first, that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence as to the negligence of the defendant, and second, that the conduct of counsel were such as to render a fair and impartial trial on the merits impossible. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 A.D. 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-gibbons-nyappdiv-1930.