Murray v. G J Transport Company, Inc.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedSeptember 25, 2009
DocketI.C. NOS. 526520 PH-2139.
StatusPublished

This text of Murray v. G J Transport Company, Inc. (Murray v. G J Transport Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. G J Transport Company, Inc., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Phillips and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing parties have not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, or amend the *Page 2 Opinion and Award. The Full Commission AFFIRMS with some modifications the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Phillips.

***********
EXHIBITS
1. Plaintiff's Exhibit No. 1 consisting of an Index of Exhibits and 1 — 25, totaling 298 pages.

2. State of North Carolina Exhibit No. 1 consisting of exhibits for hearing, including Employment Security Commission data.

3. State of North Carolina Exhibit No. 2-State and Federal Tax Returns for 2004-2007, Nixons' Personal Tax Records State and Federal for 2004-2007.

4. In addition to the evidence presented at the Deputy Commissioner hearing, the Full Commission accepts as evidence in this case the Certificate of Trust Existence and AuthorityIntervivos Trust Agreement dated November 13, 2008, and the Limited Warranty Deed for 56.09 acres in Beaufort County dated November 13, 2008, from Bradley Edward Nixon and Jenna Elizabeth Nixon, Co-Trustees, to Weyerhaeuser Company.

***********
ISSUES
1. Are any or all defendants, including individual defendants, subject to the Workers' Compensation Act?

2. At all times relevant hereto were defendants either insured or self-insured for workers' compensation purposes pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-93? *Page 3

3. Was David Franklin Murray (hereafter "decedent"), at the time of the accident, an employee of any or all defendants, including the individual defendants, and is it proper to pierce the corporate veil in this instance?

4. Did decedent die as a result of an injury by accident while in the course and scope of his employment with defendants?

5. What benefits are due as a result of decedent's death and to whom should those benefits be paid?

6. Are defendants Gregory E. Nixon and Joyce R. Nixon persons with the ability and authority to bring defendant-employer G J Transport Company into compliance with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-93?

7. Was plaintiff paid compensation within two years of the death of decedent pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-24, and if not, are defendants equitably estopped from challenging the Industrial Commission's jurisdiction?

8. Has any defendant, including the individual defendants, taken actions intended to diminish their ability to pay this claim?

9. Is plaintiff entitled to attorney's fees under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-88.1?

10. What is decedent's average weekly wage and resulting compensation rate applicable to this claim?

***********
Based on the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following: *Page 4

FINDINGS OF FACTS
1. Deceased employee David F. Murray ("decedent") was born on April 15, 1945. Decedent married Gwen Murray (hereafter "plaintiff") on January 31, 1970, and they remained married until decedent's death on November 10, 2004.

2. At the time of decedent's death, he and plaintiff lived together at their home at 132 Budd Gardwin Lane, Dunn, North Carolina, where plaintiff continues to live today.

3. At the time of decedent's death, the Murrays had two adult children. Both were employed and neither lived with the Murrays or were dependent on decedent for support.

4. At the time of decedent's death no one other than plaintiff was either wholly or partially dependent upon him for support.

5. Gregory E. Nixon and Joyce R. Nixon (hereinafter "defendants") are married.

6. On July 31, 1998, defendants incorporated G J Transport Company in North Carolina for the purpose of operating a trucking operation.

7. On or about September 8, 2004, decedent was hired as an employee truck driver for defendant-employer G J Transport Company, a trucking company based in and operating out of Pantego, North Carolina. During his employment, G J Transport Company arranged decedent's loads, set his schedule, provided the truck and trailer he operated, and dispatched decedent at its discretion. At the end of 2004, G J Transport Company issued decedent an IRS Form W-2.

8. While decedent worked for defendant-employer G J Transport Company, and at the time of his death, G J Transport Company had at least three employees.

9. On November 10, 2004, decedent, in the course and scope of his employment with defendant-employer G J Transport Company, picked up a load of Smithfield pork *Page 5 products in Benson, North Carolina, for transport to Mechanicsville, Virginia. While traveling north on Interstate 295 near Hopewell, Virginia, enroute to Mechanicsville, the tractor-trailer being operated by decedent left the road, crossed a wooden median, and crashed into the southbound shoulder of Interstate 295 where it caught fire. Decedent died in the cab of his truck from smoke and soot inhalation and thermal injuries.

10. On October 21, 2008, defendants were subpoenaed to appear and produce certain documents which would inform the Commission with regard to decedent's average weekly wage, including the exact date of hire. Defendants failed and refused to produce such documents despite admitting that such documents exist.

11. Decedent earned a total of $7,513.56 during the 63 days he worked for defendant-employer G J Transport Company. Decdent's average weekly wage is $834.82, which yields a compensation rate of $556.55.

12. Decedent's funeral expenses were paid by defendants.

13. Shortly after decedent's death, plaintiff spoke to defendant Joyce R. Nixon about benefits that might be owed as a result of decedent's death. Mrs. Nixon directed plaintiff to meet with Douglas P. Connor, an attorney in Mount Olive, North Carolina. At all times relevant hereto, Mr. Connor represented defendants.

14. Mr. Connor prepared a "Contract and Release of Claims" which plaintiff signed. The Contract and Release of Claims provided that in return for plaintiff's release of all claims against defendant-employer G J Transport Company, arising out of decedent's death, that defendant-employer would make payments in the amount of $345.00 per week for 400 weeks commencing the week of June 6, 2005, said payments to total $138,000.00. Defendants failed *Page 6 and refused to produce information which would inform the Commission as to the basis for these calculations, or whether the calculations were in any way supported by fact or law.

15. Prior to the filing of this action by plaintiff, neither the Contract and Release of Claims nor any other documents relating to this claim were presented to the North Carolina Industrial Commission for approval.

16. Plaintiff reasonably relied upon defendants and their attorney to properly calculate, handle and resolve the issue of benefits due her as a result of decedent's death.

17. Between June 10, 2005 and January 11, 2008, defendants made 136 payments to plaintiff, totaling $46,920.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
335 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Murray v. G J Transport Company, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-g-j-transport-company-inc-ncworkcompcom-2009.