Murray v. Fischer

96 A.D.3d 1320, 946 N.Y.S.2d 908
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— (1) Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules, and (2) motion for disbursements.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of harassment, making false statements and impersonation. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. [1321]*1321Inasmuch as it has been demonstrated that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Kalwasinski v Fischer, 92 AD3d 1069, 1069-1070 [2012]; Sherman v LaValley, 89 AD3d 1337 [2011]).

Mercure, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs. Ordered that the motion is granted, without costs, and petitioner is awarded disbursements in the amount of $305.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Fischer, 96 A.D.3d 1320, 946 N.Y.S.2d 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

96 A.D.3d 1320 (Murray v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. Venettozzi
104 A.D.3d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)