Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons. Read the opinion of the Court — 741 F. Supp. 2d 156
District Court, District of Columbia·Decided January 18, 2011·No. Civil Action No. 2009-1494·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

: CHARLES F. MURRAY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 09-1494 (PLF) : FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, : : Defendant. : :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 15, 2010, the BOP filed its renewed motion for summary judgment.

In its November 17, 2010 Order, the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his

obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly

warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by December 23, 2010, the Court would

treat the motion as conceded. To date, plaintiff neither has filed his opposition, nor has requested

more time to do so, nor has notified the Clerk of Court of a change of address. Accordingly, the

BOP’s motion will be treated as conceded and judgment will be entered for the defendant.

An Order is issued separately.

/s/ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: January 18, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (D.D.C. 2011).

Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.