Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
This text of Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
: CHARLES F. MURRAY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 09-1494 (PLF) : FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, : : Defendant. : :
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 15, 2010, the BOP filed its renewed motion for summary judgment.
In its November 17, 2010 Order, the Court advised plaintiff, among other things, of his
obligation to file an opposition or other response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly
warned plaintiff that, if he failed to file his opposition by December 23, 2010, the Court would
treat the motion as conceded. To date, plaintiff neither has filed his opposition, nor has requested
more time to do so, nor has notified the Clerk of Court of a change of address. Accordingly, the
BOP’s motion will be treated as conceded and judgment will be entered for the defendant.
An Order is issued separately.
/s/ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: January 18, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Murray v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-federal-bureau-of-prisons-dcd-2011.