Murray v. Emsof Realty Corp.
10 A.D.2d 619, 197 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11729
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1960·Published
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. The allegedly improper exclusion of expert testimony need not be considered since the proof establishes that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of fact. Concur —Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ. [15 Misc 2d 535.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murray v. Emsof Realty Corp., 10 A.D.2d 619, 197 N.Y.S.2d 422, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).
10 A.D.2d 619 (Murray v. Emsof Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murray v. Emsof Realty Corp.
15 Misc. 2d 535 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)