Murray v. Dunne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murray v. Dunne

8 A.D.2d 833, 190 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 833 (Murray v. Dunne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray v. Dunne, 8 A.D.2d 833, 190 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In a consolidated action and summary proceeding to impress- a trust on real property standing in the name of the decedent and to obtain possession of said property, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial adjudging that appellants, the administratrix and heirs at law of said decedent, hold title to the aforesaid property as trustees for respondent, directing specific performance of the oral trust agreement and- the conveyance of the property to the respondent, barring appellants from asserting any claim-to any estate or interest in the property, and dismissing the summary -pro- - ceeding on the merits. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with- costs. Ho opinion. Present — Holán, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a consolidated action and summary proceeding to impress- a trust on real property standing in the name of the decedent and to obtain possession of said property, the appeal is from a judgment entered after trial adjudging that appellants, the administratrix and heirs at law of said decedent, hold title to the aforesaid property as trustees for respondent, directing specific performance of the oral trust agreement and- the conveyance of the property to the respondent, barring appellants from asserting any claim-to any estate or interest in the property, and dismissing the summary -pro- - ceeding on the merits. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with- costs. Ho opinion. Present — Holán, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 833, 190 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-dunne-nyappdiv-1959.