Murray v. Coble

Supreme Court of Florida

Murray v. Coble

87 So. 639, 81 Fla. 232, 1921 Fla. LEXIS 585

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 24, 1921·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript- of the record of the decree aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in- the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the- Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, except as it may order costs to be taxed against the administratrix in violation of Section 2400, General Statutes.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript- of the record of the decree aforesaid, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in- the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the- Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, except as it may order costs to be taxed against the administratrix in violation of Section 2400, General Statutes.

All concur.

Murray v. Coble, 87 So. 639, 81 Fla. 232, 1921 Fla. LEXIS 585 (Fla. 1921).

Pincite

87 So. 639 (Murray v. Coble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.