Murray v. City of Ashburn

186 S.E. 801, 182 Ga. 699, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 544
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 2, 1936
DocketNo. 11121
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 186 S.E. 801 (Murray v. City of Ashburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. City of Ashburn, 186 S.E. 801, 182 Ga. 699, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 544 (Ga. 1936).

Opinion

Russell, Chief Justice.

Under the ruling in Harbin v. Holcomb, 181 Ga. 800 (184 S. E. 603), the court did not err in refusing a mandamus absolute. See also Green v. Spears, 181 Ga. 486 (182 S. E. 913).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. James PL. Pate, for plaintiff. JMwin A. Rogers, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Massell v. Leathers
192 S.E.2d 379 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Phillips v. Head
4 S.E.2d 240 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Hart v. Head
199 S.E. 125 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Hodges v. Kennedy
191 S.E. 377 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Lee v. State
191 S.E. 256 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 S.E. 801, 182 Ga. 699, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-city-of-ashburn-ga-1936.