Home/Supreme Court/Murray v. Cable National Broadcasting Co.

Murray v. Cable National Broadcasting Co.

519 U.S. 1058, 117 S. Ct. 689, 136 L. Ed. 2d 613, 65 U.S.L.W. 3465, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 108
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 6, 1997
DocketNo. 96-759
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 519 U.S. 1058 (Murray v. Cable National Broadcasting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Cable National Broadcasting Co., 519 U.S. 1058, 117 S. Ct. 689, 136 L. Ed. 2d 613, 65 U.S.L.W. 3465, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 108 (1997).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Kelsey-Hayes Co.
943 F. Supp. 2d 747 (E.D. Michigan, 2013)
Poole v. City of Waterbury
831 A.2d 211 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Alberto-Culver Co. v. Trevive, Inc.
199 F. Supp. 2d 1004 (C.D. California, 2002)
United States v. Baroni
14 F. App'x 815 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Garcia
143 F. Supp. 2d 791 (E.D. Michigan, 2000)
University Hospitals of Cleveland v. Emerson Electric Company and Emerson Electric Company Benefit Plan
202 F.3d 839 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. David J. Farrow
198 F.3d 179 (Sixth Circuit, 2000)
Community Insurance v. Ohayon
73 F. Supp. 2d 862 (N.D. Ohio, 1999)
United States v. Operation Rescue National
111 F. Supp. 2d 948 (S.D. Ohio, 1999)
Chiera v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
42 F. Supp. 2d 756 (N.D. Ohio, 1999)
United States v. Curtis D. Ables (96-6715) and Jackie Lamkin (96-6643)
167 F.3d 1021 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2425, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23,950r John A. McAuley Theodore A. Griggs Franklyn R. Lefevre, Sr. Gerald L. Greenlief, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. International Business MacHines Corporation, Inc.
165 F.3d 1038 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
McAuley v. International Business MaChines Corp.
165 F.3d 1038 (Sixth Circuit, 1999)
Gibbs v. Babbitt
31 F. Supp. 2d 531 (E.D. North Carolina, 1998)
United States v. Eugene H. Mathison, United States of America v. Perry Gobel, United States of America v. Robert E. Holmes, United States of America v. Dean G. Chambers
157 F.3d 541 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Sengpiel v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
156 F.3d 660 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
22 Employee Benefits Cas. 1817, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23946t Glen H. Sengpiel, Donald E. Kelly, and Donald R. Gottschalk v. The B.F. Goodrich Company, the B.F. Goodrich Pension Plan, the B.F. Goodrich Life Insurance Plan, the B.F. Goodrich Hospital-Surgical Medical Basic Plan, the B.F. Goodrich Prescription Drug Benefit Plan, the B.F. Goodrich Major Medical Plan, Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company, Uniroyal Goodrich Pension Plan, the Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company Health Care Plan, the Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company Prescription Drug Plan, the Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company Life Insurance Plan, and Michelin North America, Inc.
156 F.3d 660 (Sixth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Eugene H. Mathison
157 F.3d 541 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.
28 F. Supp. 2d 1120 (C.D. California, 1998)
Battley v. Schmitz (In Re Schmitz)
224 B.R. 117 (D. Alaska, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 U.S. 1058, 117 S. Ct. 689, 136 L. Ed. 2d 613, 65 U.S.L.W. 3465, 1997 U.S. LEXIS 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-cable-national-broadcasting-co-scotus-1997.