Murray v. Bruner
This text of 6 Serg. & Rawle 276 (Murray v. Bruner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This report is too uncertain tobe supported. The money awarded to the plaintiff is not to be paid “ until they make a correct deed of conveyance to the heirs of James Murray, deceased, of two acres and one half an acre of land” But of what land ? It may be in the valley of Cumberland, or on the top of the Blue Mountain. This part of the report cannot be rejected without destroying the whole ; for the conveyance of the land is the consideration for the money to be paid by the defendant, and without that con- ■ veyance, it was not the intent of the arbitrators that any -money should be paid. It is the opinion of the Court, therefore, that the judgment should be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Serg. & Rawle 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-bruner-pa-1820.