Murray v. Beck
17 F. Cas. 1046, 2 D.C. 677, 2 Cranch 677
This text of 17 F. Cas. 1046 (Murray v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Murray v. Beck, 17 F. Cas. 1046, 2 D.C. 677, 2 Cranch 677 (circtddc 1826).
Opinion
ordered a return of the property upon the usual reiorno’habendo bond. Morsell, J., contra, being of opinion that the Maryland Act of 1785, c. 80, § 14, did not apply, nor authorize a return in such a ease, where an officer, acting under an execution, is defendant in replevin. Ideo quaere.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 F. Cas. 1046, 2 D.C. 677, 2 Cranch 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-beck-circtddc-1826.