Murray v. Beattie Manufacturing Co.

82 A. 1047, 79 N.J. Eq. 648, 9 Buchanan 648, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 320
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 4, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 82 A. 1047 (Murray v. Beattie Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Beattie Manufacturing Co., 82 A. 1047, 79 N.J. Eq. 648, 9 Buchanan 648, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from that part of the decree which adjudges that the complainants are not entitled to the relief prayed for in respect of the salaries paid to the officers of the corporation. We think the vice-chancellor was right in this portion of the decree, and, upon the appeal of Murray and others, there must be an affirmance for the reason stated by the vice-chancellor.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisoh, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon, White—12. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A. 1047, 79 N.J. Eq. 648, 9 Buchanan 648, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-beattie-manufacturing-co-nj-1912.