Murray v. AET Inc. Ltd

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED . SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:” □□ DATE FILED: 6/28/2021 Erin F. Murray, : Plaintiff, : : 21-CV-3360 (VSB) -against- : : ORDER AET Inc. Ltd and MV Eagle Turin, : Defendants. :

wane eK VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: On June 26, 2021, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). “[W]hen a plaintiff properly amends [a] complaint after a defendant has filed a motion to dismiss that is still pending, the district court has the option of either denying the pending motion as moot or evaluating the motion in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.” Pettaway v. Nat’l Recovery Sols., LLC, 955 F.3d 299, 303-04 (2d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that Defendants shall file a letter within seven (7) days deciding whether their motion to dismiss should be deemed moot without prejudice to refile a new motion to dismiss in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), or if I should evaluate Defendants’ current motion to dismiss in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2021 □□ isi New York, New York fy | ] f Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge