Murray Oil Products Co. v. Poons Co.
This text of 191 Misc. 1005 (Murray Oil Products Co. v. Poons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Concur: Hoestadter and Hecht, JJ.; Hammer, J., dissents in the following memorandum: I dissent and vote for reversal. The agent’s implied warranty of authority, the source being disclosed by cable, was conditional at the risk of the buyer. The latter having modified the agreement for a valuable consideration cannot hold either the seller or its agent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 Misc. 1005, 80 N.Y.S.2d 28, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-oil-products-co-v-poons-co-nyappterm-1948.