Murray
This text of 165 N.E.2d 586 (Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition dismissed. The petitioner seeks by this petition to establish the truth of exceptions set forth in his “final Substitute Bill of Exceptions.” The docket does not show that any order was made permitting this substitute bill to become an amendment to the original bill. The petitioner’s right, if any, to the establishment of exceptions is limited to the bill of exceptions he filed originally with amendments [786]*786thereto allowed by the trial judge. G. L. c. 231, §§ 113, 117. Not being such an amendment, this “final Substitute Bill of Exceptions” has no standing and cannot be allowed in this court. Graustein, petitioner, 304 Mass. 679. Rines, petitioner, 331 Mass. 714, 716.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 N.E.2d 586, 340 Mass. 785, 1960 Mass. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-mass-1960.