Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota

Eleventh Circuit

Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota

350 F.3d 1301, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23480, 2003 WL 22707140

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 18, 2003·No. 02-16762·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court’s analysis was correct in all respects. Based upon our de novo review of the record, we have determined there was no reversible error in the judgment entered for Appellees. Our determination is based upon several reasons including, but not limited to, Appellant’s *1250 failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Appellees intentionally discriminated against him.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court’s analysis was correct in all respects. Based upon our de novo review of the record, we have determined there was no reversible error in the judgment entered for Appellees. Our determination is based upon several reasons including, but not limited to, Appellant’s *1250 failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Appellees intentionally discriminated against him.

AFFIRMED.

Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota, 350 F.3d 1301, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23480, 2003 WL 22707140 (11th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

350 F.3d 1301 (Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.