Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota

Eleventh Circuit

Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota

350 F.3d 1301, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23480, 2003 WL 22707140

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedNovember 18, 2003

Docket02-16762

StatusPublished

This text of 350 F.3d 1301 (Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray J. Klauber v. City of Sarasota, 350 F.3d 1301, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23480, 2003 WL 22707140 (11th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court’s analysis was correct in all respects. Based upon our de novo review of the record, we have determined there was no reversible error in the judgment entered for Appellees. Our determination is based upon several reasons including, but not limited to, Appellant’s *1250 failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Appellees intentionally discriminated against him.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We find it unnecessary to decide whether the district court’s analysis was correct in all respects. Based upon our de novo review of the record, we have determined there was no reversible error in the judgment entered for Appellees. Our determination is based upon several reasons including, but not limited to, Appellant’s *1250 failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Appellees intentionally discriminated against him.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 F.3d 1301, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23480, 2003 WL 22707140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-j-klauber-v-city-of-sarasota-ca11-2003.