Murray First Thrift & Loan Co. v. Benson

Utah Supreme Court

Murray First Thrift & Loan Co. v. Benson

563 P.2d 185, 1977 Utah LEXIS 1112

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedApril 12, 1977

DocketNo. 14684

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 563 P.2d 185 (Murray First Thrift & Loan Co. v. Benson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murray First Thrift & Loan Co. v. Benson, 563 P.2d 185, 1977 Utah LEXIS 1112 (Utah 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Before us is an order of the court below dismissing, with prejudice, counts two and three of plaintiff’s third-party complaint against George P. Ruff. We affirm that order, and award costs to Ruff.

This case was some sixteen months in preparation. All parties appeared at the appointed time for trial. A jury was impaneled, and opening statements were made. At this juncture a noon recess was called. During this recess plaintiff settled its claim against the Bensons — the Bensons agreed to transfer certain realty to plaintiff. As a result, plaintiff moved counts two and three of its third-party complaint, against Ruff, be dismissed without prejudice; for the reason plaintiff would not know “until we have liquidated the Benson property whether, and to what extent, Murray has been injured ... by Mr. Ruff.”

Counsel for Ruff objected, and moved the court to dismiss counts two and three with prejudice. He stated he had been some sixteen months in preparation, and his client was there ready to proceed. The court inquired of counsel for plaintiff, if he were ready to proceed, he said “no,” giving the reason quoted above. Thereupon the court took the action we have affirmed.

Rule 41(a)(2), U.R.C.P., invests the court with a reasonable discretion in the matter of dismissals. The record does not disclose this discretion to have been abused. (Shaffer v. Evans, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 134.)

ELLETT, C. J., and CROCKETT, WILKINS and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Before us is an order of the court below dismissing, with prejudice, counts two and three of plaintiff’s third-party complaint against George P. Ruff. We affirm that order, and award costs to Ruff.

This case was some sixteen months in preparation. All parties appeared at the appointed time for trial. A jury was impaneled, and opening statements were made. At this juncture a noon recess was called. During this recess plaintiff settled its claim against the Bensons — the Bensons agreed to transfer certain realty to plaintiff. As a result, plaintiff moved counts two and three of its third-party complaint, against Ruff, be dismissed without prejudice; for the reason plaintiff would not know “until we have liquidated the Benson property whether, and to what extent, Murray has been injured ... by Mr. Ruff.”

Counsel for Ruff objected, and moved the court to dismiss counts two and three with prejudice. He stated he had been some sixteen months in preparation, and his client was there ready to proceed. The court inquired of counsel for plaintiff, if he were ready to proceed, he said “no,” giving the reason quoted above. Thereupon the court took the action we have affirmed.

Rule 41(a)(2), U.R.C.P., invests the court with a reasonable discretion in the matter of dismissals. The record does not disclose this discretion to have been abused. (Shaffer v. Evans, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 134.)

ELLETT, C. J., and CROCKETT, WILKINS and HALL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

563 P.2d 185, 1977 Utah LEXIS 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-first-thrift-loan-co-v-benson-utah-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack