Murray Cure Institutes Co. v. Ward

121 N.W. 878, 108 Minn. 527, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 757
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 22, 1909
DocketNos. 16,079—(131)
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 121 N.W. 878 (Murray Cure Institutes Co. v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray Cure Institutes Co. v. Ward, 121 N.W. 878, 108 Minn. 527, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 757 (Mich. 1909).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the county of Koochiching.

The only question presented by the record is whether the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff’s motion for a change of the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses. Such a motion is directed to the discretion of the trial court. Sims v. American Steel Barge Co., 56 Minn. 68, 57 N. W. 322, 45 Am. St. 451. Upon a full consideration of the record, we are of the opinion that the court did not abuse its discretion in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

King v. Schultz
43 N.W.2d 278 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)
Richmond v. Whitaker
255 N.W. 681 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1934)
Simons v. Munch
132 N.W. 321 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.W. 878, 108 Minn. 527, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-cure-institutes-co-v-ward-minn-1909.