Murray Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Bernstein

141 A. 750, 104 N.J.L. 664, 19 Gummere 664, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 285
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 14, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 141 A. 750 (Murray Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Bernstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Bernstein, 141 A. 750, 104 N.J.L. 664, 19 Gummere 664, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tebnohard, Parker, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 16.

For reversal — Kone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leadership Real Estate v. Harper
638 A.2d 173 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Geo. H. Beckmann, Inc. v. Charles H. Reid & Sons
130 A.2d 48 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
The First New Hampshire Corp. v. Van Syckle
117 A.2d 656 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Weinstein v. Clementsen
90 A.2d 77 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
141 A. 750, 104 N.J.L. 664, 19 Gummere 664, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-apfelbaum-inc-v-bernstein-nj-1928.