Murray Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Bernstein

141 A. 750, 104 N.J.L. 664, 19 Gummere 664, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 14, 1928·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Judge Dungan in the Circuit Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tebnohard, Parker, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzbnbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskirk, McG-lennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 16.

For reversal — Kone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murray Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Bernstein, 141 A. 750, 104 N.J.L. 664, 19 Gummere 664, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 285 (N.J. 1928).

141 A. 750 (Murray Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Bernstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leadership Real Estate v. Harper
638 A.2d 173 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Geo. H. Beckmann, Inc. v. Charles H. Reid & Sons
130 A.2d 48 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
The First New Hampshire Corp. v. Van Syckle
117 A.2d 656 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Weinstein v. Clementsen
90 A.2d 77 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)