Murrah v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murrah v. State

806 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2002 WL 126175

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 2002

DocketNo. 1D01-4433

StatusPublished

This text of 806 So. 2d 594 (Murrah v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murrah v. State, 806 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2002 WL 126175 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the “Amended Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief,” entered January 31, 2001, in Hamilton County Circuit Court case number 93-148-CF, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Nee. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

MINER, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition seeking a belated appeal of the “Amended Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief,” entered January 31, 2001, in Hamilton County Circuit Court case number 93-148-CF, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for treatment as a notice of appeal. Nee. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

MINER, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

806 So. 2d 594, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 986, 2002 WL 126175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murrah-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.