Murr v. Johnson

14 P.3d 646, 171 Or. App. 80, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1880
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 15, 2000
Docket98-04-29-660M; CA A104916
StatusPublished

This text of 14 P.3d 646 (Murr v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murr v. Johnson, 14 P.3d 646, 171 Or. App. 80, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1880 (Or. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Antunez v. Lampert, 169 Or App 196, 7 P3d 735 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Antunez v. Lampert
7 P.3d 735 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 P.3d 646, 171 Or. App. 80, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murr-v-johnson-orctapp-2000.