Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons

452 So. 2d 593, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons. Read the opinion of the Court — 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21552 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 9, 1984·No. No. 83-595·Published

Opinions

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in which the trial court concluded appellant was not entitled to the relief it sought, namely, specific performance, because there was no enforceable oral contract for the sale and purchase of the real property involved. We commend the trial judge for verbalizing into the record, at the conclusion of the two-day non-jury trial, not less than eleven pages, reciting his findings of fact. These recitals reflect that he listened carefully to the evidence and judiciously weighed it. Accordingly, we affirm.

ANSTEAD, C.J., concurs. WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in which the trial court concluded appellant was not entitled to the relief it sought, namely, specific performance, because there was no enforceable oral contract for the sale and purchase of the real property involved. We commend the trial judge for verbalizing into the record, at the conclusion of the two-day non-jury trial, not less than eleven pages, reciting his findings of fact. These recitals reflect that he listened carefully to the evidence and judiciously weighed it. Accordingly, we affirm.

ANSTEAD, C.J., concurs. WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons, 452 So. 2d 593, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

452 So. 2d 593 (Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.