Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons

452 So. 2d 593, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 1984
DocketNo. 83-595
StatusPublished

This text of 452 So. 2d 593 (Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy White Dairy, Inc. v. Simmons, 452 So. 2d 593, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinions

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in which the trial court concluded appellant was not entitled to the relief it sought, namely, specific performance, because there was no enforceable oral contract for the sale and purchase of the real property involved. We commend the trial judge for verbalizing into the record, at the conclusion of the two-day non-jury trial, not less than eleven pages, reciting his findings of fact. These recitals reflect that he listened carefully to the evidence and judiciously weighed it. Accordingly, we affirm.

ANSTEAD, C.J., concurs. WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 So. 2d 593, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-white-dairy-inc-v-simmons-fladistctapp-1984.