Murphy v. Zink

57 A.2d 388, 136 N.J.L. 635, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 286
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1948
StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.2d 388 (Murphy v. Zink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Zink, 57 A.2d 388, 136 N.J.L. 635, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 286 (N.J. 1948).

Opinion

*636 Pee Cueiam.

The judgment under review herein is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Burling in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Donges, Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Schettino, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.2d 388, 136 N.J.L. 635, 1948 N.J. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-zink-nj-1948.