Murphy v. Woods

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 7, 1996·No. 95-20870·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20870

Conference Calendar

CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

S.O. WOODS, Jr.; J.R. PETERSON, Warden; R.D. BOYD; J. SIMETAL; J.A. SIMPSON, Jr.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA H 93-2540 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher J. Murphy argues that the district court abused

its discretion in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as

frivolous.

We have reviewed the record, the reasons given by the

district court for the dismissal of the complaint at the

conclusion of the Spears** hearing, and Murphy's brief, and we

*

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

**

Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).

No. 95-20870

-2-

determine that the dismissal of the complaint as frivolous should

be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district

court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Woods, (5th Cir. 1996).

Murphy v. Woods (Murphy v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related