Murphy v. Woods
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-20870
Conference Calendar
CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
S.O. WOODS, Jr.; J.R. PETERSON, Warden; R.D. BOYD; J. SIMETAL; J.A. SIMPSON, Jr.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA H 93-2540 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996
Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Christopher J. Murphy argues that the district court abused
its discretion in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as
frivolous.
We have reviewed the record, the reasons given by the
district court for the dismissal of the complaint at the
conclusion of the Spears** hearing, and Murphy's brief, and we
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
**
Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985).
No. 95-20870
-2-
determine that the dismissal of the complaint as frivolous should
be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district
court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Murphy v. Woods (Murphy v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.