Murphy v. Winter

173 A. 793, 87 N.H. 481, 1934 N.H. LEXIS 45
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJune 28, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 A. 793 (Murphy v. Winter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Winter, 173 A. 793, 87 N.H. 481, 1934 N.H. LEXIS 45 (N.H. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiffs were passengers in the defendant’s car and were injured in a collision between that car and one driven by Harold Snedeker, at the intersection of Union and Salmon streets in Manchester. Winter was going east on Salmon street and Snedeker *482 north on Union street. The latter is a through street and there is a stop sign on its westerly side at Salmon street.

There was the usual conflict of testimony. The defendant claimed that he stopped before entering the intersection and then proceeded across slowly. Snedeker testified that the defendant came across the intersection at a high speed, giving Snedeker no time to avoid a collision. This conflict presented an issue for the jury.

Judgments on the verdicts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dunsmore v. Ralston Purina Co.
10 A.2d 665 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A. 793, 87 N.H. 481, 1934 N.H. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-winter-nh-1934.