Murphy v. Wentworth

36 Tex. 147
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 36 Tex. 147 (Murphy v. Wentworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Wentworth, 36 Tex. 147 (Tex. 1872).

Opinion

Walker, J.

The only error in this case necessary to be noticed is in the return of the alternative writ of mandamus. The writ, if sued out in vacation, should be made returnable to the next term of the District Court for the county wherein the respondent resides. It was therefore error to make the writ returnable at chambers; and it was error to hear and determine the case at chambers and grant the peremptory writ. The appellant is in error, contending that a rule should have first issued on the respondent, ordering him to appear and show cause why the alternative writ should not issue. The alternative writ is itself in the nature of a rule to show cause why the peremptory writ should not issue.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause dismissed without prejudice.

Eeversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. Blair
196 S.W. 1153 (Texas Supreme Court, 1917)
San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Blair
196 S.W. 502 (Texas Supreme Court, 1917)
Thorne v. Moore
105 S.W. 985 (Texas Supreme Court, 1907)
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Denton
68 S.W. 336 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1902)
Fisher v. Mayor of Charleston
17 W. Va. 628 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Tex. 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-wentworth-tex-1872.