Murphy v. Village of Dolgeville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Murphy v. Village of Dolgeville

207 A.D.2d 969, 617 N.Y.S.2d 672

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 30, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 969 (Murphy v. Village of Dolgeville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Murphy v. Village of Dolgeville, 207 A.D.2d 969, 617 N.Y.S.2d 672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

[970]*970—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that respondents complied with General Municipal Law § 207-m by increasing petitioner’s salary by at least the same dollar amount granted to the highest ranking subordinate position in the bargaining unit (see, 1984 Opns St Comp No. 84-20). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Tenney, J.—Article 78.) Present—Balio, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[970]*970—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly determined that respondents complied with General Municipal Law § 207-m by increasing petitioner’s salary by at least the same dollar amount granted to the highest ranking subordinate position in the bargaining unit (see, 1984 Opns St Comp No. 84-20). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Tenney, J.—Article 78.) Present—Balio, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 969, 617 N.Y.S.2d 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-village-of-dolgeville-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack