Murphy v. United States

198 F.2d 87, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 118, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3148
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided July 3, 1952·No. 11321_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of obstructing justice, D.'C.Code 1940, § 22-703, and was sentenced to prison. Several months afterward, he filed a motion for new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence, which was denied after hearing.

The alleged newly discovered evidence was asserted to be a Juvenile Court record of a prosecution witness and was to be presented for purposes of impeaching that witness. As this court has said in Thompson v. United States, 1951, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 235, 188 F.2d 652, to obtain a new trial because of newly discovered evidence, the evidence relied on must not be merely cumulative or impeaching. We therefore conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial. 1 We intimate no view upon whether the Juvenile Court record would have been admissible under other circumstances.

Affirmed.

1

. Counsel on appeal was not counsel in the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. United States, 198 F.2d 87, 91 U.S. App. D.C. 118, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3148 (D.C. Cir. 1952).

198 F.2d 87 (Murphy v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huggins v. United States
333 A.2d 385 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1975)
United States v. Willie Bell, (Two Cases)
506 F.2d 207 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
United States v. Abraham W. Bolden
355 F.2d 453 (Seventh Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Herman Brewster
231 F.2d 213 (Second Circuit, 1956)
Connie Wilkins, Jr. v. United States
228 F.2d 37 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)