Murphy v. Unidentified Ramirez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 25, 1996·No. 95-40924·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40924 Conference Calendar __________________

TRACEY W. MURPHY, a/k/a Shakim Supreme,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNIDENTIFIED RAMIREZ, Lt.; CURTIS STARR, CO III,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-162 - - - - - - - - - - April 17, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tracey W. Murphy appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

We have examined Murphy's arguments and the record and find no

error in the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Murphy v.

Unidentified Ramirez, No. 6:95-CV-162 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 1995).

Murphy's appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

We caution Murphy that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Murphy is further cautioned to review any pending

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-40924 -2-

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous because they have been previously decided by this

court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Unidentified Ramirez, (5th Cir. 1996).

Murphy v. Unidentified Ramirez (Murphy v. Unidentified Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related