Murphy v. Tallardy

412 So. 2d 62
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 7, 1982
DocketNo. 81-798
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 412 So. 2d 62 (Murphy v. Tallardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Tallardy, 412 So. 2d 62 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have fully considered all of the appellate points presented and find no reversible error demonstrated. However, we do not believe it appropriate for the wife to have sole discretion to determine [63]*63what constitutes reasonable visitation rights and thus we strike from the order of April 8, 1981, the portion that allows the wife the right to determine the husband’s visitation rights so that the order will grant reasonable visitation rights to the father. It would appear appropriate for the Pennsylvania Court to supervise all future matters of child custody and visitation between these parties so long as they and the children continue to reside there.

As so modified the order appealed from is affirmed.

DOWNEY, BERANEK and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waugh v. Waugh
705 So. 2d 659 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Savoy v. Savoy
529 So. 2d 829 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
412 So. 2d 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-tallardy-fladistctapp-1982.