Murphy v. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America

87 S.E. 808, 17 Ga. App. 686, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 855
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 21, 1916·No. 6303·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

Under the ruling in Shippey v. Owens, ante, 127 (86 S. E. 407), a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, in a trial before a jury in that court, is without authority to award a nonsuit. The judgment in this case must therefore be Reversed.

Action for breach of contract; from municipal court of Atlanta. January 16, 1915. J. B. McOallum, Bari Sims, for plaintiff. Anderson, Slate & D’Orr, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Murphy v. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America, 87 S.E. 808, 17 Ga. App. 686, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 855 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

87 S.E. 808 (Murphy v. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Wood
147 S.E. 173 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Atlanta & Lowry National Bank v. First National Bank
145 S.E. 521 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)