Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Murphy v. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America

Murphy v. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America

87 S.E. 808, 17 Ga. App. 686, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 855
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 21, 1916
Docket6303
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 808 (Murphy v. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murphy v. Sulzberger & Sons Co. of America, 87 S.E. 808, 17 Ga. App. 686, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 855 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, J.

Under the ruling in Shippey v. Owens, ante, 127 (86 S. E. 407), a judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, in a trial before a jury in that court, is without authority to award a nonsuit. The judgment in this case must therefore be Reversed.

Action for breach of contract; from municipal court of Atlanta. January 16, 1915. J. B. McOallum, Bari Sims, for plaintiff. Anderson, Slate & D’Orr, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Wood
147 S.E. 173 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Atlanta & Lowry National Bank v. First National Bank
145 S.E. 521 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 808, 17 Ga. App. 686, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-sulzberger-sons-co-of-america-gactapp-1916.