Murphy v. State
This text of 45 S.W.2d 615 (Murphy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The offense is theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for four years.
The stolen property consisted of four sets of harness. The injured party testified that the value of the harness was $63.90. He qualified as to knowledge of the value. There was an extended cross-examination of the witness, upon which is based the contention that the evidence did not prove the value of the stolen property to exceed $50, and that the court should not have instructed the jury upon felony theft.
The testimony is quite sufficient to sustain the action of the court and to support the verdict of the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 S.W.2d 615, 119 Tex. Crim. 632, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murphy-v-state-texcrimapp-1931.